Índice de pulsatilidad del Doppler de las arterias uterinas para predecir preeclampsia: revisión de literatura
Conza, Chamba, Chiliquinga
16
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Técnica de Manabí. Portoviejo, Ecuador
17.
Pedroso M, Palmer K, Hodges R, Costa F, Rolnik D. Uterine artery doppler in screening for
preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia [Internet].
2018; 40(5):287-93. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660777
18.
Bindu S. Uterine artery Doppler in first trimester in prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in
Dharmapuri district of Tamil Nadu. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol [Internet].
2020;9(10):4268-73. Disponible en:
https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204008
19.
Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA: a scale for the quality assessment. Research
Integrity and Peer Review [Internet]. 2019; 4(5). Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-
0064-8
20.
Pereira J, Pereira Y, Quirós L. Actualización en preeclampsia. Revista Médica Sinergia [Internet].
2020;5(1):e340. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.31434/rms.v5i1.340
21.
Wu JN, Li MQ, Xie F, Zhang B. Gestational week-specific of uterine artery Doppler indices in
predicting preeclampsia: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
[Internet]. 2021;21(1). Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04329-9
22.
Obican SG, Odibo L, Tuuli MG, Rodriguez A, Odibo AO. Third trimester uterine artery Doppler
indices as predictors of preeclampsia and neonatal small for gestational age. Journal of Maternal-Fetal
and
Neonatal
Medicine
[Internet].
2020;33(20):3484-9.
Disponible
en:
https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1575804
23.
Cairo V, Jiménez S, Machado HL, Cardet Y, Milián I, Rodríguez L. Doppler ultrasound of uterine
arteries as a predictor of preeclampsia and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Clin Invest
Ginecol
Obstet
[Internet].
2021;48(2):104-9.
Disponible
en:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gine.2020.08.002
24.
Bohórquez-Camargo DC, Guerrero-Solano AM, Becerra-Mojica CH, Díaz-Martínez LA. Doppler de
arterias uterinas en embarazadas hipertensas crónicas como predictor de preeclampsia con criterios de
severidad sobreagregada y necesidad de cuidados intensivos. Ginecol Obstet Mex [Internet].
2021;89(8):611-21. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v89i8.5473
25.
Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, Kapur A, Hadar E, Divakar H, et al. The International Federation of
Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester
screening and prevention. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics [Internet].
2019;145(S1):1-33. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12802
26.
Sotiriadis A, Hernandez-Andrade E, da Silva Costa F, Ghi T, Glanc P, Khalil A, et al. ISUOG Practice
Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound in
Obstetrics
and
Gynecology
[Internet].
2019;53(1):7-22.
Disponible
en:
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20105
27.
Adil Ali S, Gamal El-Din Mansour M, Farouk O, Mohammed WE. Efficiency of placental three
dimentional power Doppler ultrasonography for predicting preeclampsia in early pregnancy. Egyptian
Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine [Internet]. 2018;49(3):892-8. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.11.006
28.
Prakansamut N, Phupong V. Serum SHARP1 and uterine artery Doppler for the prediction of
preeclampsia. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2019;9(1). Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-
48727-8
29.
Loardi C, Fratelli N, Mazzoni G, Orabona R, Zanardini C, Valcamonico A, et al. Uterine artery
Doppler for the prediction of outcome in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive pregnancy
disorders.
Pregnancy
Hypertens
[Internet].
2021;
26:69-74.
Disponible
en:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2021.09.004
30.
Wright A, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Georgantis A, Nicolaides KH. Two-stage screening for preterm
preeclampsia at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2019;220(2):197.e1-
197.e11. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.092