“Funds” in case of mass torts: solidarity, efficiency, or just a fiction?
Keywords:
derecho civil;, responsabilidad civil;, estatus jurídico;, derecho de los contratos, acuerdosAbstract
Debido a la pandemia por Covid-19, los fondos en el caso de mass torts toman su relevancia al ser considerados como una forma de compensar a la responsabilidad civil. Esta solución de rápido y fácil acceso deben contar con una regulación debida que permita conservar aquellos aspectos generales y específicos de la aplicación de esta figura. Por eso, este artículo se centra en el análisis de los fondos en casos de agravios masivos por la posible efectividad que podrían tener para responder al daño causado por la pandemia Covid-19 para suplir las brechas en la responsabilidad civil mediante un estudio conceptual, doctrinario y normativo. Lo importante es que no se transformen en herramientas para escapar de la responsabilidad.
Palabras clave: derecho civil, responsabilidad civil, estatus jurídico, derecho de los contratos, acuerdos.
Downloads
References
Feinberg, K. R. (2011). The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001: Policy and Precedent. NYL Schearch Law Review, 56, 1115-1118. https://n9.cl/pfmow
Gilles, M. (2011). Public-Private Approaches to Mass Tort Victim Compensation: Some Thoughts on the Gulf Coast Claims Facility. DePaul Law Review, 61, 419-465.
Goldberg, J. C. P. (2011). Doing Justice in the Face of a Disaster. Akron Law Review, 45 (3), 583-589. https://n9.cl/hzhux
Hensler, D. R. (2004). Alternative Courts-Litigation-Induced Claims Resolution Facilities. Stanford Law Review, 57, 1429-1439. https://n9.cl/d8etn
Issacharoff, S. and Theodore Rave, D. (2013). The BP Oil Spill Settlement and the Paradox of Public Litigation. Louisiana Law Review, 74, 397- 431. https://n9.cl/g1wxb
Maggiolo, M. (2020). Una autentica solidarieta` sociale come eredita` del coronavirus: per una diversa destinazione dei risarcimenti del danno alla salute. Giustiziacivile.com. https://n9.cl/9jakw
McGovern, F. E. (2004). The What and Why of Claims Resolution Facilities. Stanford Law Review, 57, 1361-1389. https://n9.cl/iqblr
Mullenix, L. S. (2012). Aggregate litigation and the death of democratic dispute resolution. Northwestern University Law Review, 107(2), 511-564. https://n9.cl/ycbkw
Mullenix, L. S. (2015). Designing Compensatory Funds: In Search of First Principles. Stanford Journal Complex Litigation, 3, 1-31. https://n9.cl/5h27h
Nagareda, R. A. (2008). Mass torts in a world of settlement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Osaka, E. (2019). Current Status and Challenges in the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Compensation Scheme: An Example of Institutional Failure? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3318877
Redish, M. H. (2009). Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Modern Class Action. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Salvi, C. (2019). La responsabilita` civile, Trattato Iudica-Zatti. Milano: Giuffre.
Scognamiglio, C. (2020). La pandemia Covid-19, i danni alla salute ed i limiti della responsabilità civile. Nuova Giurisprudenza Civile Commentata, 140-146.
Stier, B. G. (2011). The Gulf Coast Claims Facility as Quasi-Public Fund: Transparency and Independence in Claim Administrator Compensation. Mississippi College Law Review, 30 (2), 255-275. https://n9.cl/jwg1d
Weiss, S. (2016). The Flint, Michigan Water Crisis: Concurrent Private-Public Funds as the Most Effective Legal Tool to Compensate Victims. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 19, 1025-1059. https://n9.cl/g6bpt
Zimmerman, A. S. (2016). The Global Convergence of Global Settlements. University of Kansas Law Review, 65, p. 1053-1091. https://n9.cl/m3vfu
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Francesca Benatti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.