Hybrid Mendelian–Bayesian Algorithm for Probabilistic Inference of Genotypes in Pedigrees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33936/isrtic.v10i1.8393Keywords:
Genotype inference, Bayesian inference, Mendelian genetics, Equine coat colorAbstract
This study presents a hybrid algorithm—grounded in Mendelian inheritance and Bayesian updating—to infer genotype probability distributions from observable phenotypes (coat color) and pedigree structures when direct genetic data are unavailable. Each individual is represented by a genotype distribution (with fully known genotypes modeled as degenerate distributions), and a distribution-based “cross” operator combines parental distributions to obtain the expected genotype distribution in the offspring. Phenotypic constraints are incorporated by filtering out incompatible genotypes and renormalizing, while both downward and upward inference are supported: offspring evidence updates parental beliefs and vice versa. Validated on simulated populations (small nuclear families and deeper pedigrees) for a single biallelic locus, the algorithm reproduces classical Mendelian proportions under parental certainty, coherently propagates uncertainty when parents are partially specified, and converges steadily under repeated observations. Although current assumptions (single locus, no mutation or recombination, perfect phenotype observation) limit immediate applicability to complex real data, the method’s clarity, interpretability, and ease of implementation make it a practical and explainable tool for breeding programs, conservation planning, and education. It also provides a transparent foundation for future multilocus extensions and models incorporating observation noise.
Downloads
References
Almudevar, A., & LaCombe, J. (2012). On the choice of prior density for the Bayesian analysis of pedigree structure. Theoretical Population Biology, 81(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2011.12.003
Gianola, D., Fernando, R. L., & Schön, C. C. (2022). Inference about quantitative traits under selection: A Bayesian revisitation for the post-genomic era. Genetics Selection Evolution, 54(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00765-z
Liu, X., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Chen, W., Kou, X., Liang, H., Ren, W., Khan, M. Z., & Wang, C. (2024). Coloration in Equine: Overview of Candidate Genes Associated with Coat Color Phenotypes. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 14(12), 1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121802
Modak, M., Mustahasin Pritom, M., Chandra Banik, S., & Rabbi, S. (2025). Internet of Things‐Based Health Surveillance Systems for Livestock: A Review of Recent Advances and Challenges. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 1(15). https://doi.org/10.1049/wss2.70013
Ormond, C., Ryan, N. M., Cap, M., Byerley, W., Corvin, A., & Heron, E. A. (2024). BICEP: Bayesian inference for rare genomic variant causality evaluation in pedigrees. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 26(1), bbae624. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae624
Pathak, R. K., & Kim, J.-M. (2024). Veterinary systems biology for bridging the phenotype–genotype gap via computational modeling for disease epidemiology and animal welfare. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 25(2), bbae025. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae025
Saha, S., Layek, S., Ray, H., Ghosh, A., Majumdar, S., Ghosh, D., Chakraborty, R., Pramanik, A., Parua, T., & Mukherjee, S. (2024). Recent Trends of IoT Enabled Wearable Sensors: An Extensive Application of Cattle Health Monitoring. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1551, 201–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-9983-4_15
Sponenberg, D. P., & Bellone, R. (2017). Equine color genetics (4th edition). Wiley Blackwell.
Todd, E. T., Fromentier, A., Sutcliffe, R., Running Horse Collin, Y., Perdereau, A., Aury, J.-M., Èche, C., Bouchez, O., Donnadieu, C., Wincker, P., Kalbfleisch, T., Petersen, J. L., & Orlando, L. (2023). Imputed genomes of historical horses provide insights into modern breeding. iScience, 26(7), 107104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107104
Treccani, M., Locatelli, E., Patuzzo, C., & Malerba, G. (2023). A broad overview of genotype imputation: Standard guidelines, approaches, and future investigations in genomic association studies. BIOCELL, 47(6), 1225–1241. https://doi.org/10.32604/biocell.2023.027884
Ullah, E., Mall, R., Abbas, M. M., Kunji, K., Nato, A. Q., Bensmail, H., Wijsman, E. M., & Saad, M. (2019). Comparison and assessment of family- and population-based genotype imputation methods in large pedigrees. Genome Research, 29(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.236315.118
Zhang, Y., Jiang, B., Zhu, J., & Liu, J. S. (2011). Bayesian Models for Detecting Epistatic Interactions from Genetic Data: Bayesian partition for epistasis mapping. Annals of Human Genetics, 75(1), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.2010.00621.x
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alexander Stefano Mora Matamoros, Javier Hernán López-Zambrano, Carlos Octavio Larrea-Izurieta, Diego Alexander Toala Palma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles submitted to this journal for publication will be released for open access under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivative Works licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).
The authors retain copyright, and are therefore free to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate the work under the following conditions: Acknowledge credit for the work specified by the author and indicate if changes were made (you may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that the author endorses your use of his or her work. Do not use the work for commercial purposes. In case of remixing, transformation or development, the modified material may not be distributed.
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3498-719X

